<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bentov on BIOCOMPUTER</title>
    <link>https://biocomputer.com/tags/bentov/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Bentov on BIOCOMPUTER</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://biocomputer.com/tags/bentov/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Itzhak Bentov: The Proto-Biocomputer Theorist Who Got There 50 Years Early</title>
      <link>https://biocomputer.com/blog/itzhak-bentov-proto-biocomputer/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://biocomputer.com/blog/itzhak-bentov-proto-biocomputer/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 1977, an engineer with no formal academic degree published a book that described the human body as a piece of hardware, consciousness as software, and meditation as a system optimization routine. The book was &lt;em&gt;Stalking the Wild Pendulum&lt;/em&gt;. The author was &lt;strong&gt;Itzhak Bentov&lt;/strong&gt; — inventor, mystic, and arguably the first person to think seriously about biology as computation.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Bentov died two years later in the 1979 American Airlines Flight 191 crash. He never saw the field of biocomputing emerge. But reading his work in 2026, against the backdrop of Cortical Labs&amp;rsquo; CL1 chips and FinalSpark&amp;rsquo;s Neuroplatform, something uncomfortable becomes clear: he was pointing at the right problem, with the wrong vocabulary, at exactly the right time.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;At BioComputer we don&amp;rsquo;t traffic in mysticism. But we do pay attention when an engineer&amp;rsquo;s framework — however unconventional — maps cleanly onto where biology-as-computation is actually going.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
